![]() ![]() You’ll also need a lens with a fast aperture to capture the stars, moon, Milky Way or Northern Lights at night. Although fixed aperture zoom lenses may be expensive, they are more versatile in terms of applications – such as when you transition from daytime to night photography.Īperture is an important thing to take note of when looking for a new lens. Photo by: 'Pixabay'.Ī lens with a fast aperture is particularly useful in low light conditions, such as when shooting sunrise and sunset. What you want to look for is a lens with a fixed aperture (e.g. f/4.5-5.6), which is not ideal for landscape photography. While kit lenses make it easier for photographers to get started shooting right away, they usually have a variable aperture (e.g. ![]() These days, new cameras often come packaged with a default zoom lens. See also: Understanding Lens Flare in Landscape Photography.These two qualities mean that you’ll end up with images that are consistently sharp in focus from the foreground all the way to the background. The reason that they’re so revered is that they allow you to capture a large range of view and long depth of field, which is basically what most photographers want when they set out to photograph landscapes. Their focal lengths usually range from 14-35mm, though some can be as wide as 10 or 12mm. Wide angle and ultra-wide angle lenses are the most popular lenses for landscape photography. These include wide or ultra-wide angle lenses, standard zoom lenses, telephoto lenses and prime lenses. There are four main types of lenses that are used commonly in landscape photography. These are a few things that you should look for when shopping for a new lens.ĭo your research before investing in a new lens. It’s a good idea to do your research before making any investments, as camera lenses can get quite expensive. What Makes a Great Landscape Photography Lens? ![]() See also: Which Camera Lens to Use? An Introduction to Focal Lengths.The RF50mmf1.2 is clearly the best 50mm Canon has ever produced and 50mm is a very important focal length to me. I have a smart phone that take very good pictures but I have $20K or more sunk in Canon to produce pictures that are of high IQ in taken demanding non repeating circumstances with outcomes of higher importance to me from a shooting event that I will choose to not trust to a smartphone or a point & shoot camera. Alternative have two overall scores with one just IQ issues and other include these preference issues. It is good to note them but these are personal preference quite distinct from IQ issues. All three lenses are amazingly good and I would given all three tie scores overall and have no weighing to overall score for size, weight and feel. ![]() That is just me and love of the Canon colors. I would not like the chroma issues of the Sony that he found. I like the fell of new RF50f1.2 finish more than predecessors. Not all plastics are cheap or worse for ruggedness and strength. He says he does not like what he calls the plastic feel of the Canon as being not as much to his liking as the older EF lens finishes. I see with my own eyes his charts and his comments make sense. I have always enjoyed the detailed in his reviews. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |